place where you learn about hot trends and meet the trendsetters

water colours is much better than oil colours
create a muv

<< back to muvlist muv details


about 1 year ago | created by 267
| category : Entertainment

well... how about the idea of:

Leaving behind the gegraphic boundaries for administrative purposes and having a co-operative society called "World"



Googleicon_blue_small  in favour    Googleicon_red_small  against   
comments
136
comments about 1 year ago Bullet_right

and follow one currency - so it doesnt really matter where you earn... ha ha that is cool....oh wow, I really wish - no wars amongst countries & peace all along...

But is this against the way countries evolve ???

267
comments about 1 year ago

want to buy that new DLP TV eh :))
on a serious note... we need have a single currency...
that can still be whatever it is currently in that region...
and we can have a "Global Money Index" which will give the value... a la UTC is for the clock time... well clock is a simpler issue than money though :p

and nope... this is not against anything...
this is just an idealistic opinion about having a world

just like Socrates' "Republic"... well that's way to idealistic and too much of philosophy...

but this, i feel, is practically achievable...

119
comments about 1 year ago

This is practically achievable. At least sci-fi novels says so. But what are the motives and what are the implications?

Do you want to make a world without any world wars? Want to see world peace? Believe me that will not happen. People like to compete. They want to make groups. To do that they will dig out differences between each other. Thats a psychology that every community will have.

Ultimately what will happen is this - instead of blaming 100 governments for not keeping a peaceful earth, we will blame just one government (Brought to power, mostly by, ourselves)

252
comments about 1 year ago

This is a concept that will make us feel better when we think of that and nothing more. Suppose something like this happens, we'll differenciate ourselves on the basis of XYZ instaed of countries. It will kill the competetion all together. Sobody will plant and somebody else will feed on it and it might be concern for the prior.

And btw, I'm against any kind of forced equality.

137
comments about 1 year ago

that is an interesting concept - forced equality.. perhaps having one govt cannot come in that category.. for it would still be a sort of democracy... but on the other hand, yes, lot of people would resist it cuz it implies a sort of mixing of all races (in time) so that no separate race exists... what happens to one's sense of individuality then, i wonder.

151
comments about 1 year ago Bullet_right

@nihar
Any form of government (democratic/dictatorial) will have to use some sort of force. A world without government....well, may be possible for small and isolated communities.

@trisha
Do u think race alone defines individuality? Besides, no culture can exist without adapting and evolving continuously.

I agree with arun. A world government won’t stop all kind of conflicts.
But, it will bring positive in our outlook.
At least the ‘Us Vs Them’ list will have one less item.

267
comments about 1 year ago

yes... now that's interesting...

the point is to have single co-operative government structure

and we have all these to tackle...

let's go one by one:

1. Race > one of the points of individuality

for indentifying ourselves... we need to still use the countries... the language and all that...
"Race" will still be there... this is not going touch that area... 'cause that touches other sensitive issues... religion for example.. and we're not talking about that here at all

2. Competition > the "Us vs Them" thing
yes... this is a serious issue... after all it's human to be the better one in the lot... we need to think a lot here...
may be i can add one point... we have to start from identifying the resources different countries need... and the places they're available... then chart out who does what...

resources: this can mean anything...

this is only one... there's going to be such points to be covered

we should remember this:
this is about multilateral agreement...
not a single forced government, for this would then become dictatorship. When u force, equality looses it's meaning

we will still have governments and kingdoms
federation and democracy and communism will still be there...

it's about how we all start to interact with each other in a postive way...
the basic motto of all humans is to be happy in their own way...

may be the zeroth step towards this will be a co-operative society of different organisation, unlike the UN - which is an union of countries, this will be an society of organisations all existing organisations including the UN will be a member here...

i am talking about a process which will be happening for almost a century... but what we should do now is simple... take the first step...

u need not have a flood light to climb the stairs. a candle will do.

267
comments about 1 year ago

hey... btw we are not just going start one more group and another emblem to remember and more set of meetings...

no...

we must evolve this idea...
we're not starting the society now...
first we must formulate what exactly all wants...

can we go ahead start adding points to resolve this Race and Competition and find few more and start resolving all of them one by one...

151
comments about 1 year ago

That's something to chew on.

But interfacing between the existing governments/sovereigns will be tough.

If we are talking about different world organizations looking after different socio-economic needs of the world....there's still going to be power-play. Issues like 'which country is in control of which organizations' still exist and will always be there.

But yes....it will be the first tentative step ahead.

Organizations like UN, WTO, WHO can still co-exist as they have distinct functionality. But some redundant ones like G8 and D8 forums will have to cease.

hey! where r we going?!

267
comments about 1 year ago

point to be noted...

3. Power Play

we should not have "control"...
we should have only principles and guidelines
no more redundant organisations
should think of more points here... but a must in the list...

4. Socio-Economic needs of the people
yes... while we avoid competition and things... the part of the DONTs list... THIS 4th point is part of the DOs

hmm... storming...

@where are we going?!
we're only in the first step... we need to climb up to know :)
let's see :))




to post comments  sign in / register


check the muvers
151
   136
   267