<< back to muvlist
muv details
well... how about the idea of:
Leaving behind the gegraphic boundaries for administrative purposes and having a co-operative society called "World"
check the muvers
a world ... photos
third pl... photos
recent reviews
recent comments
recent photos
categories
third pl... photos
no photos yet
related muvs
recent reviews
recent comments
nano is a cute little
car.. would love to drive
on...
and the cost is high.
i am confused. air
deccan is not the old air
deccan ...
i started gym a couple
of days ago. enjoying it!
hungrybangalore has
stuck yet another cord
with its ...
love the mini
i love the corolla
toyota is worlds no 1
carmaker ho...
nano is nice looking!
blaze is beautiful
flyte has front fueling
access doesnt flyte has
mobi...
categories
Arts (2)
Automobiles (23)
Beverages (15)
Careers & Jobs (9)
Celebrities (5)
Cinema (6)
Computers & Internet (60)
Entertainment (14)
Food (32)
Hobbies & Recreation (12)
Home & Lifestyle (58)
International (0)
Local & Regional (3)
Media (5)
Music (9)
News (1)
Pets (2)
Politics (3)
Real Estate (4)
Religion (2)
Science & Technology (20)
Shopping (15)
Society & Culture (2)
Software (9)
Sports (20)
Television (6)
Travel (20)






view profile view watchlist
gees is offline
latest muv by gees
one day...
view gees's muvs
and follow one currency - so it doesnt really matter where you earn... ha ha that is cool....oh wow, I really wish - no wars amongst countries & peace all along...
But is this against the way countries evolve ???
view profile view watchlist
rajbow is offline
latest muv by rajbow
a world...
view rajbow's muvs
want to buy that new DLP TV eh :))
on a serious note... we need have a single currency...
that can still be whatever it is currently in that region...
and we can have a "Global Money Index" which will give the value... a la UTC is for the clock time... well clock is a simpler issue than money though :p
and nope... this is not against anything...
this is just an idealistic opinion about having a world
just like Socrates' "Republic"... well that's way to idealistic and too much of philosophy...
but this, i feel, is practically achievable...
view profile view watchlist
arun is offline
latest muv by arun
no car
view arun's muvs
This is practically achievable. At least sci-fi novels says so. But what are the motives and what are the implications?
Do you want to make a world without any world wars? Want to see world peace? Believe me that will not happen. People like to compete. They want to make groups. To do that they will dig out differences between each other. Thats a psychology that every community will have.
Ultimately what will happen is this - instead of blaming 100 governments for not keeping a peaceful earth, we will blame just one government (Brought to power, mostly by, ourselves)
view profile view watchlist
nihar98 is offline
latest muv by nihar98
long ha...
view nihar98's muvs
This is a concept that will make us feel better when we think of that and nothing more. Suppose something like this happens, we'll differenciate ourselves on the basis of XYZ instaed of countries. It will kill the competetion all together. Sobody will plant and somebody else will feed on it and it might be concern for the prior.
And btw, I'm against any kind of forced equality.
view profile view watchlist
trisha is offline
latest muv by trisha
single ...
view trisha's muvs
that is an interesting concept - forced equality.. perhaps having one govt cannot come in that category.. for it would still be a sort of democracy... but on the other hand, yes, lot of people would resist it cuz it implies a sort of mixing of all races (in time) so that no separate race exists... what happens to one's sense of individuality then, i wonder.
view profile view watchlist
persephone is offline
latest muv by persephone
honda a...
view persephone's muvs
@nihar
Any form of government (democratic/dictatorial) will have to use some sort of force. A world without government....well, may be possible for small and isolated communities.
@trisha
Do u think race alone defines individuality? Besides, no culture can exist without adapting and evolving continuously.
I agree with arun. A world government won’t stop all kind of conflicts.
But, it will bring positive in our outlook.
At least the ‘Us Vs Them’ list will have one less item.
view profile view watchlist
rajbow is offline
latest muv by rajbow
a world...
view rajbow's muvs
yes... now that's interesting...
the point is to have single co-operative government structure
and we have all these to tackle...
let's go one by one:
1. Race > one of the points of individuality
for indentifying ourselves... we need to still use the countries... the language and all that...
"Race" will still be there... this is not going touch that area... 'cause that touches other sensitive issues... religion for example.. and we're not talking about that here at all
2. Competition > the "Us vs Them" thing
yes... this is a serious issue... after all it's human to be the better one in the lot... we need to think a lot here...
may be i can add one point... we have to start from identifying the resources different countries need... and the places they're available... then chart out who does what...
resources: this can mean anything...
this is only one... there's going to be such points to be covered
we should remember this:
this is about multilateral agreement...
not a single forced government, for this would then become dictatorship. When u force, equality looses it's meaning
we will still have governments and kingdoms
federation and democracy and communism will still be there...
it's about how we all start to interact with each other in a postive way...
the basic motto of all humans is to be happy in their own way...
may be the zeroth step towards this will be a co-operative society of different organisation, unlike the UN - which is an union of countries, this will be an society of organisations all existing organisations including the UN will be a member here...
i am talking about a process which will be happening for almost a century... but what we should do now is simple... take the first step...
u need not have a flood light to climb the stairs. a candle will do.
view profile view watchlist
rajbow is offline
latest muv by rajbow
a world...
view rajbow's muvs
hey... btw we are not just going start one more group and another emblem to remember and more set of meetings...
no...
we must evolve this idea...
we're not starting the society now...
first we must formulate what exactly all wants...
can we go ahead start adding points to resolve this Race and Competition and find few more and start resolving all of them one by one...
view profile view watchlist
persephone is offline
latest muv by persephone
honda a...
view persephone's muvs
That's something to chew on.
But interfacing between the existing governments/sovereigns will be tough.
If we are talking about different world organizations looking after different socio-economic needs of the world....there's still going to be power-play. Issues like 'which country is in control of which organizations' still exist and will always be there.
But yes....it will be the first tentative step ahead.
Organizations like UN, WTO, WHO can still co-exist as they have distinct functionality. But some redundant ones like G8 and D8 forums will have to cease.
hey! where r we going?!
view profile view watchlist
rajbow is offline
latest muv by rajbow
a world...
view rajbow's muvs
point to be noted...
3. Power Play
we should not have "control"...
we should have only principles and guidelines
no more redundant organisations
should think of more points here... but a must in the list...
4. Socio-Economic needs of the people
yes... while we avoid competition and things... the part of the DONTs list... THIS 4th point is part of the DOs
hmm... storming...
@where are we going?!
we're only in the first step... we need to climb up to know :)
let's see :))